Disclosure2003
Maryland 8th District Congressional
Campaign of Stephen Bassett
Press
Release
October 17, 2002
Bethesda, MD
– The ugly national trend in which independent and third party
candidates are excluded from polls, media coverage, debates and forums
continues here in Montgomery County Maryland in the 8th
District Congressional election.
Stephen Bassett, the
independent candidate in the 8th District, has been excluded
from numerous campaign debates and forums.
These include events sponsored by Common Cause of Maryland, B'Nai
Israel Congregation/B'nai Men’s Club, and the Jewish Community Center
of Greater Washington/Seniors Organized for Change.
[Note: Spear Lancaster, the Libertarian Party candidate for
governor, who got on the ballot via 35,000 nominating signatures, is
also being excluded from nearly all debates and forums.]
But the most egregious example
of this exclusionary practice is the upcoming debate to be held at
Montgomery College, the largest community college in the state, with all
three of its campuses in the 8th Congressional District.
This candidate debate is being
co-sponsored by a coalition of civic associations and the Montgomery
College Alumni Association and is scheduled for Monday, October 21 at 8
pm. The debate coordinator,
Thomas Curtis, a member of the King Farm Civic Association, contacted
the Disclosure2003 campaign and stated that, “only parties which
received at least 20% of the vote in the last election will be allowed
to participate in this debate.” He
then added, “Obviously this means only the Democrat and Republican
Party candidates will be present.”
Disclcosure2003 immediately
contacted Steve Simon, Director of Communications for Montgomery College
and the school’s coordinator for the event.
Simon was respectful, responsive and conveyed the candidate’s
desire to participate to the civic association coordinator, Curtis, and
also spoke with News Channel 8, which is televising the debate.
Curtis refused to change the candidate criteria, and News Channel
8 was noncommittal. Bassett
would not participate. [10/20/02
Note: on Friday, 10/18/02, the situation was reversed and the candidate
was invited. Also, News Channel 8 was not a party to the
decision to initially exclude the candidate from the debate. SB]
A request was then made that
Montgomery College cancel its participation on the grounds it sends the
wrong message to the students, is a slap in the face to the 71,000
voters registered as independents in the 8th District, an
insult to the 5177 registered voters who signed the D2003 nominating
petitions, and not in keeping with the values of one of the most
educated and multicultural communities in the nation. It was made clear this was not possible.
Legal challenges to this
national scandal of exclusion have been rejected in the courts time
after time. Only when the
American people become aware of how dangerous this trend is to the
nation, get sufficiently angry, and demand reform through legislation,
will the “Closing of the American Mind,” as the late Allan Bloom put
it, be reversed
Ralph Nader was excluded from
the presidential debates. He
wanted to talk about corporate greed, abuse of power and abrogation of
community responsibility. The
Democrat and Republican Party candidates wanted nothing to do with that
issue. Nader was right, but
Bush and Gore went unchallenged. Now
taxpayer supported Montgomery College will continue this kind of
exclusionary politics.
Phone 202-215-8344 -
ParadigmRG@aol.com
t
www.disclosure2003.net
4938
Hampden Lane, #161, Bethesda, MD 20814 |